Wedding agreements carry out tend to mean the timeframe when you look at the and this amarriage should have chosen to take lay

1. Yet ,, inside genealogy and family history, each of us knowthat for each signal there can be an exclusion. A beneficial vexing part ofgenealogy is that not one person most understands exactly how to put on the fresh exceptions orrules with people decisive adjective such always, maybe, probably,likely, etc. It will be fascinating when the there most other instances ofjointures becoming generated a-year otherwise a few just after a known wedding day.

2. Could there be an extant dispensation for the marriage off ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who were 3rd cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or next cousins, immediately following removed from new fifth LordClifford? Who narrow down its matrimony go out.

Arthur

Presumably, if the a great dispensation try found and offered, it can havebeen by one of several after the, and may can be found in the brand new correspondingregister book, if it survives:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop off York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out-of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop off York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop off Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop from Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1509-1520

5. Whether your tenth Lord Clifford do wed during the early 1487 [say January] andhas Elizabeth after in that 12 months, do the chronology perhaps not really works?

John possession?

Age born in later 1487, Henry born for the 1488/9, Joan when you look at the ,etcetera. completing the fresh new brands of your posting from . In the event that (a) thechronology nevertheless work; and (b) their unique marriage part wasn’t low; thenwe only have new 1505 pedigree out of Henry VII’s that is into the oppositionto the fresh conjecture one she are a valid child.

six. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Could be the Clifford daughters brand new onlyknown Henry VII relationships omitted? Are there other people? If that’s the case,wouldn’t one echo badly on this subject document https://internationalwomen.net/sv/sydafrikanska-kvinnor/ just like the a resource?

Regarding contrasting You will find produced from the brand new c.1505 Henry VII Connections pedigreeswith the fresh new 1480-1500 Visitation of one’s Northern pedigrees, being

In the c.1505 Relationships pedigrees, the brand new Clifford youngsters are maybe not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but alternatively from the St. John pedigree. Once the I’mnot familiar with the fresh St. John family unit members, after the ‘s the pointers asit appears throughout the c.1505 pedigree, due to the fact taken from new 1834 Coll. Ideal. etGen. post. The fresh new phrasing into the quotations is strictly whilst looks inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).

“Zero. XII.”Away from my Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess from Somerset had around three husbands.” Of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My Lady the latest King’s Mother.” who had “The brand new King.” whohad “Prince “From the “Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest spouse.” she got 3 daus & dos sons:

Good. “Edith, married so you’re able to Geoffrey Pole away from Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. wedded with the Lady Margaret, dau. of theDuke away from Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded in order to Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[an alternative youngster, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d four pupils:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Four daughters and you can oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to help you Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young man and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, married in order to Thomas Kent, Esq. from Lincolnshire.”B4. “A Nun out-of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, married in order to Sir Richard Frognall.” They’d:C1. “Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and you may sistren.” That have issueindicated, however named.C2. “Age, married so you can Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Elizabeth, married basic towards the Lord Zouche; immediately following for the LordScrope away from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [because of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”Elizabeth. George. John. William.”D2. [because of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Which have issueindicated however named.

Margaret Duchess out of Somerset, by “Lionel Lord Welles, past husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. out-of K. Edward IV.” andthey had “E.”